Showing posts with label Revolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Revolution. Show all posts

Saturday, October 07, 2023

The Seeds of Destruction

There's expression which seems to aptly apply to the current state of America like no other which goes like this,  "every revolution contains within it the seed to its own destruction". The expression originates from author Frank Herbert's magnum opus, "Dune", first serialized in the sci-fi magazine "Analog" from 1963 through 1965 and finally published as a book in 1965.

The expression was given voice by the character "Princess Irulan", the emperor's daughter, as she said "...if history teaches us anything, it's simply this: every revolution carries within it the seeds of its own destruction. And empires that rise will one day fall". Have truer words ever been spoken (even if only by a fictional character)?

The United States was founded based on the concept of freedom of the individual, no matter what that entailed. We had the right to live where we wanted. To believe---or not---what we wanted. To lives our lives with as little government interference as possible. This was to be the land where the individual was sovereign. 

We welcomed everyone with a dream and who longed for freedom. It was here that a "seed" of the revolution which was planted by our Founding Fathers. In time it would be called The Tree of Liberty. It would bear fruit and shade for all Mankind or so hope our nation's Founders.

 That seed has struggled to survive. It's been watered with the sweat and blood of countless Americans. Some have sought to dig it up while others wanted to cage it and change it. Now that seed has grown into something not wholly expected.

We allowed ourselves to become distracted. We turned over its care to those for whom care was their own interests. They watered it too freely with our blood and sweat. They pruned too deeply, cutting away the lives of our young men and women for their temporal benefit like placing a rose in a vase. They deprived it of nourishment by cutting off its sources of knowledge as others poisoned its roots with lies and distortions.

The Republic created on that hot July day in Philadelphia in 1776 has passed as all empires do in their Autumns, yet those who destroyed haven't allowed it to fully take its place in history. They sought to hide what they've done by showing us reflections.   

Perhaps we were willing to be deceived. Unable to face what we had allowed.  But if we're to save it, we must let it go and salvage what we can. It's decay didn't result from the idea itself. The seed itself was good. Perhaps it placed too much faith on the individual. It's slow decay the result of our lack of attention. In the end, it shows that freedom is never free or safe, even in soil where it was planted.

 

If you enjoyed the article, please consider passing it along to others and don't forget to subscribe. It's free! Lastly please be sure to "like" us on whatever platform you use to read anotheropinionblog.com. It helps with the algorithms and keeps our articles in circulation. Thank you!

 

 

Thursday, August 17, 2023

When Government Doesn't Trust The People: Who Blinks First?

 

The Founding Fathers didn't trust government. Nearly everything they did politically before, during and after the revolution was a reflection of that mistrust. Well, it should come as no surprise that modern Americans don't trust the government either.

Opinion polls have shown lows which borders on contempt for Congress, the judicial system, and the Presidency for decades. Even our trust of mainstream media, religion, financial system and our educational system and governmental bureaucracy with its myriad of agencies have reached anemic levels.

Perhaps even worse than our mistrust of institutions, is our lack of trust in our fellow citizens. We are more divided than at any time since the 1760's of the pre Revolution War. Others have argued that we're in fact much closer to the pre-Civil War years of the 1850's. Either way, it doesn't bode well for the country.

So, what should we make of government's apparent mistrust of its citizens? After all,  we've become a de facto surveillance state with camera nearly everywhere. We're monitored and tracked everywhere we go. Facial recognition is practically universal. Government has the technology to implement a police state unlike anything ever seen in the history of civilization.  

The following video from an episode of "On The Homefront" on CBN News entitled "Federal Agencies Arming Themselves" which brings home the point. The government has been on a buying spree of military grade weapons and ammo. It has been challenging our constitutional rights at an alarming rate. Some, as indicated in the video, claim that for all intents our Constitution is no longer a living document.  

There's no question that we've become a corporatocracy led by a super wealthy Oligarchy.   All we have to do is watch the biased "news" to see the two tier justice system at work (or should I say "not at work'?). Our trust of the mainstream media is nearly as low as that of Congress, which is something relatively new (as an aside, conservatives distrust the media at a higher percentage than liberals do).

There have been numerous psychological studies which have shown that when an individual or small group of individuals are treated with distrust, it tends to provoke anti-societal like behavior in that individual or group. Thus, one has to wonder whether we are being maneuvered into some reaction?  

Perhaps the result of this provoked behavior could trigger mass protests, riots, looting, violence such as we're now seeing in places like San Francisco, and so forth. If these manufactured  actions produce a certain "critical mass", it would be all the excuse needed to declare martial law and implement a police state. 

Then too, what about claims on both sides of mass election fraud and "stolen elections"? Are we going to start asking the United Nations to send in election monitors like we would for some failed democracy? 

The ongoing use of the FBI and judicial system to conduct a political vendetta and character assassination to neutralize an opponent is a gross misuse of power worthy of some third world banana republic.  Loss in faith of the electoral process has been central to the eventual fall of nearly every government down through history. Have we reached that point? 

There's no question that since 9/11 and the subsequent "Patriot Act" was implemented, the United States has moved in a decidedly anti-democratic direction. The Department of Homeland Security, the growth of the deep state and its affiliated intelligence agencies, and our state of perpetual war (be it direct or indirect) gives us about as much of a warm and fuzzy feeling as jackboots outside our front door.

Check out the video from CBN and see what you think. It runs just 7:05 minutes.  

 

Video: Federal Agencies Arming Themselves

CBN News

 

If you enjoyed the article, please consider passing it along to others and don't forget to subscribe. It's free! Lastly please be sure to "like" us on whatever platform you use to read anotheropinionblog.com. It helps with the algorithms and keeps our articles in circulation. Thank you! 

Friday, January 27, 2023

Is a Civil War in the Cards for America?

 It's been said here many times, and I think it's appropriate to say it again. America is more divided than at any time since just before the Civil War just over 150 years. We are actually more divided on the number of issues than were our forefathers, and the division on those issues appears to be at least as deep as it was back in the late 1850's. There seems to be the same lack of interest in compromise. Politics has become, for all intent and purpose, scorched earth.  It's all or nothing.

Let's look as the recent 2022 election. For the first time (at least in recent history), there was a protest which morphed into an attempt at a coup by intimidation. Such was the anger directed at Congress. But who was really surprised? The approval rating for the House has been in the toilet for decades as has that of the Senate.

 In most countries, with approval ratings like these (some as low as 9%, but most around low 20's) would have already triggered a revolution.  What did we expect? Even the judicial system has shown negative numbers along almost every other institution in America. Ironically, despite the Antifa and BLM "peaceful" riots and lootings, the police was one of the few institutions whose numbers were positive (along with the military).  

As of September 2022, some ten months after the Presidential election, 61% of Republicans believe the election was rigged; that Joe Biden didn't win the election fairly. On the other side of that coin, some 64% of voters don't believe the January 6 protest was spontaneous. In both instances that's 6 out 10 individuals (as an aside, immediately after the election 70% of Republicans and conservatives that the election was stolen).

To make matters worse, the majority of Americans no longer trust the mainstream media (or as conservatives now call it, "lamestream" media). To further irritate the Right, the liberal media continues to call the opposition to Biden's election the "Big Lie", echoing Reich Minister Joseph Goebbels' use of the term when referring to his brand of propaganda (a backhanded way of calling Republicans and conservatives "Nazis").

When Trump was President, the Left routinely waved flags and chanted "not my President" and the media encouraged it. When Trump supporters did the same thing (referring to Biden), it's suddenly "anti-American". Could the bias get any more obvious? 

Meanwhile, political establishment has lined up to go after Trump and his supporters every way they can, with the media carrying virtual non-stop coverage despite continuously getting some of their lowest viewership numbers ever.

The media's role has traditionally been providing the American People and the world with impartial and unbiased news. It's essential to a free nation. However, since Watergate the media (which has come under an ever tightening control of a smaller and smaller number of corporate owners) has become increasingly biased as to be essentially nothing more than the mouthpiece of their owners.

According to a Gallup Poll from October 2022, only 34% of Americans trust the mainstream media...despite how slick or sincere they look. When broken down by the partisanship, 70% of Liberals and Democrats trust the media, which given its liberal list, isn't surprising. 14% of conservatives and Republicans agree (likely Fox viewers), along with 11% of Independents (the nation's majority political bloc).

In case you're wondering, 96+% of all media is owned by just five corporations. That means everything you read, see, and hear. It also includes the movies you watch. The music formats you hear. The newspapers, magazines, and even what books are published.

They control internet content (and who gets censored, blocked, or "shadow blocked" such as yours truly). They even willing cooperate with government agencies in turning over personal information. Joseph Goebbels would have wet dreams over this kind of clout!

So, how serious it is...really? Well, it ain't good. According to a poll taken in August 2022 said that 66% of Americans believe that the divisions in this country have gotten worse since 2021. 62% of those think things are going to get worse with 60% expecting an increase in political violence.

Another poll from August 2022, roughly 43% of those polled think a civil war is likely in the next 10 years. A further 14% expect something close to a Civil War within the next decade or so. 55% of Republicans and conservatives agreed. So did 40% of Democrats. A earlier poll, from July 2022, indicated the number of Americans who expected a civil war sometime "over the next several years" was 50%.

The liberal leaning Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights was even more pessimistic. They said that 78% of Americans believe democracy is currently "under attack" (it is, but not by who they think). 53% think that America will no longer be a democracy in four to five years (not breaking news: we never were a democracy. We were a Republic, but no longer. We're a neo-fascist Corporatocracy). 54% say we're on the path to a civil war.

As an aside, their polling also indicated that race relations in America is getting worse. 62% say that discrimination against blacks is a "big problem". 62% think the government should do more to protect blacks. 66% want the government to take steps to lessen racial inequality while 55% want to see the government to do more to end income inequality. 67% want to see gay marriage protected while 62% want to protect abortion rights. 

A University of Virginia poll from  October 2020 said that they felt America was already in a cold civil War. The same poll also showed that 41% of those who voted for Joe Biden thought it was time to "split the country".  The Institute of Politics at Harvard's Kennedy School released an even more stunning poll result.

According to their poll, over half of those under 30 years of age saw America as "failing" with over one-third expecting a civil war in their lifetimes. But what if that happened? Well, the Civil War was the bloodiest America has ever experienced bar none. Approximately 600,000 people died during the four year conflict. 

Using the same percentage killed based on population, that would translate to about 19.8 million today, and that number could easily go higher. Much higher given that we have a far greater percentage of trained veterans as a percentage of population now than they did then, not to mention the deadliness of the weapons available.

They say that every revolution contains within its own seeds for self-destruction. While the Civil War was fought to preserve the Union, America's future might be more balkanized. Our increasing diversity---racial, ethnic, and so forth, all under the guise of "multiculturalism" may well be the culprit.  It has already manifested itself in our politics by challenging our values, traditions, and even language.  

These changes are showing up in our neighborhoods and communities in the form of more drugs, more crime, and more violence, especially in the form of racial and ethnic gangs murdering for control of territory. In some instances, they demand "their own" do the policing, which is rejection of our legal system.

We already see "Little Havana", "Little Vietnam", "Little China", "Little Columbia", and so on. No longer do they seek to mix and integrate into their new homeland as our immigrant ancestors before them had done. Instead, they remain aloof and separate. Some don't even bother to learn English or allow their children to be taught the language despite being supported by taxpayer dollars, adding insult to injury.

Perhaps the only solution would be the balkanization of America, leaving  it a loosely based confederation of regions. It's happened before. It happened in Ancient Greece, in Ancient Rome, the Holy Roman Empire, the British Empire, and elsewhere. We are, as humans, naturally tribal after all.

 One thing is for sure, doing nothing will not only result in a de facto balkanization along various social, racial, and economic lines, under a neo-fascist Corportracy, but also allow the increasing diverse cultures to come into conflict, providing a greater excuse for the expansion of the surveillance state.

It seems there is only one other option, and that's to accept the multiculturalism on our own terms. But that means that the country we've known---our collective history---and we grew up with has to be allowed to fade into the past. No dominance of any one race or culture or language. It means changes in laws, values, and acceptance of different or perhaps new religions which could dominate or replace older ones. It means starting over again as a country surrounded by those who wish us harm.

It's possible. It's too has happened before, under Alexander the Great, Cyrus the Great, the Kings of Persia, and, albeit briefly, the Austro-Hungarian Empire. You could even include the Mongol Empire. But it's all dependent on maintaining liberal societies along with tolerant leaders and capable administrators. The instant someone comes who shows a preference or a tendency toward despotism, and it crumbles. Some have suggested an economic and political system run by artificial intelligence.

The power elites who dominate this country has been trying to divide us any way they can for decades. In that they've been largely successful. Divided we are easily controlled and manipulated. United and we're unstoppable, but can we do it? We've reached one of those historical crossroads. A "Rubicon" if you'd like, which will be crossed whether we want to or not. What will it be?  

 

 If you want to know more about this article's topic, please check out the links below. If you enjoyed the article, please consider passing it along to others and don't forget to subscribe. It's free! Lastly please be sure to "like" us on whatever platform you use to read anotheropinionblog.com. It helps with the algorithms and keeps our articles in circulation. Thank you! 

 

Poll: 61% of Republicans still believe Biden didn't win fair and square in 2020


64% Think The January 6th Attack On The Capital Was Planned


Americans' Trust of the media Remains Near Record Lows.


Two in five Americans say a civil war is at least likely inthe next decade...


Leadership Conference  Poll:  54 Percent Fear America Is on the Path to Another Civil War...


Imagine another American Civil War, but this time in everystate


The Rise and Fall of Multicultural Empires


 

Saturday, June 06, 2020

Understanding the Difference between Protesting, Rioting, and Looting: A Primer in Civil Disobedience


Apparently there seems to be some confusion between protesting and rioting for social change and looting for the sake of destroying property and stealing other people's stuff. So, I thought it would be a good idea to write a short primer about the difference between the three.

Protesting is the act of civil rebellion. By the word "civil", I mean respectful. Civil protesting is as old as civilization itself. In fact, it was probably the first act people undertook to bring about change (coupled with the sacrifice of some unfortunate sheep, chicken, or pig).

The act of protest is to force change on the ruling establishment. It's usually brought about when some event or issue is seen as "unjust" by a segment of the population.

In recent years its usually been about rationing of food or gas, cutting of government assistance, voting rights, housing, increases in taxes, or influencing foreign policy such as ending a war (Vietnam comes to mind) or perhaps starting one (like the Spanish American War following the destruction of the USS Maine) and the unwillingness of the political leaders to satisfy the demands of the public.

Protesting is usually seen as a good thing. The ability of the populace to take to the streets and express their voices without fear of repercussions by the authorities is seen as a sign of a healthy society. Governments which repress the right of the people to gather and speak their collective mind freely is typically viewed as a indication of a repressive or authoritarian society (worse yet, dictatorial should the government fail to act on or consider the people's demands without the benefit of open dialogue).

That's not to say that all demands by the protestors should be enacted. Hardly. Many times the demands are based on emotion or missing facts which could make the situation worse. However, with the government's tendency to withhold pertinent information either due to national security concerns or simply as a form of cover-up, the public begins to get more agitated, which then can lead to an increase in protests and possibly violence in the form of riots.

If that should happen, the government has to choice to put down the violence, which almost always makes the situation that much more violable. It's at this stage that more radical elements of the public become more openly engaged. It's their sole desire to see the situation become more violent and manipulate public opinion by making it appear that the government is solely at fault.This is typically accomplished by provoking the police or military and getting them to respond in a hostile manner such as seen to shoot, beat, or manhandle the protestors who are always portrayed as being innocent of any wrongdoing.

Simply put, in a confrontation between protestors and the authority, the victor is the one who one controls the appearance of having the moral high ground. In the case of the government, it must prove justification for what might otherwise be seen as "heavy handedness" or infringing on the people's rights. In the case of the protestors, it can be viewed as justification for their calls of resistance or even assaults on the establishment as a form of "self-defense". One great example us the shooting of Crispus Attucks, a free man of color (he was part black and part Native American; a longshoreman by trade) who is thought to be first person killed in the cause of the American Revolution.

The place was Boston Massachusetts on March 5th of 1770 when colonists faced off against British soldiers following a failed attempt by the British Government to impose a stamp tax on the colonists two years earlier. This resulted in the Townshed Acts (named after Charles Townshed, the Chancellor of the Exchequer) which were enacted by the British Parliament between 1767 and 1768.

The purpose of the Acts were multifold---to raise revenue for the Crown in order to pay the salaries of judges and governors, enforcing compliance of trade agreements with England, to punish New York for failing to comply with "Quartering Act" requiring citizens to house and feed British troops in their homes, and most important of all, establishing a precedent that the Crown could and would impose taxes on the colonies at its discretion. Of course, the colonists rejected the acts out of hand, which led to the confrontation in Boston Commons amid two years of mounting tensions.

Initially, young children threw snowballs at the soldiers and called them names. This was followed by a group of colonists complaining to a soldier than an officer had previously refused to pay a barber's bill. The situation quickly escalated. Soon snowballs became rocks and pieces of wood. At some point the sound of a shot rang out. No one knew if it was an actual gunshot or something else, but it didn't matter. The British troops opened fire on the citizens. When the smoke cleared, five colonists were dead and six were wounded. The first to die was Crispus Attucks, who had been twice hit in the chest.

The early Founding Fathers, particularly Sam Adams, Paul Revere, John Hancock and Henry Pelham, made quick use of the media available to paint a vivid picture of abuse at the hands of British troops, thus fanning the flames of a simmering revolt. Nevertheless, the "Boston Massacre" as it became known included every aspect of a successful protest, including provoking the government into violence which was exploited to the hilt as any propagandist worth their salt would do (downplaying some points while highlighting and even exaggerating others) and commanding public opinion.

In short, protests are the means whereby the people can make their desires known when the ballot box either fails or is simply not available or suitable given the immediacy of the situation in a peaceful and nonviolent way. It can be exploited into providing the groundwork for a greater expression and be a catalyst for more severe reforms or even platform for revolution.

As for riots and looting, they are a separate but related expression of protests by the people. As a general rule, riots are not planned or organized as protests typically are. They tend to be formed when a small group of people are outraged by some event and choose to express their anger in the form of violence, be it attacks on people or property. However, the chief object of their anger is almost always some symbol of authority or the cause of their anger such as a particular building (police, city hall, etc). A classic example is the storming of the Bastille in Paris at the outset of the French Revolution.

What started out as protest quickly degenerated into a riot led (as most are) by a small but determined angry mob. In this case, the peasants were tired of the abuses by the French monarchy and the elites (which, together, made up just 2% of population) over their "privileges", ever rising taxes and a judicial system known for its horrific treatment of prisoners; many of whom were imprisoned over their inability to pay the ever increasing taxes and fees which had gone on for decades.

Finally, on July 14, 1786, the French lower classes---the peasants, farmers, and merchants (aka the "commoners") had enough. Protests turned into riots and then into armed insurrection. The Hotel des Invalides, a government complex which included government offices and monuments, was stormed first. By the time the Bastille was stormed there were only seven prisoners being held. Nevertheless, it was seen as a symbol of the abuse. It ultimately led to the start of the French Revolution and eventual overthrow of the French monarchy and the elite status quo.

Riots are not uncommon. They typically occur when the crowd is overtaken by anger, usually at the behest of a small but focused group. The crowd, following group mentality, tend to simply join in the chaos (i.e.: "getting caught up in the moment"), often finding themselves just as shocked by the carnage as everyone else once it's over like a drunk after a "lost weekend".

The best thing to counter a riot is for the majority of the protestors to physically dissociate themselves the rioters as much as possible. If that's not possible, they should attempt to identify the rioters to the authorities or, if it can be done safely, attempt to either redirect the crowd or stop prevent the violence from spreading. However, it should be pointed out that riots and rioters are dangerous.

Lastly, looters. They are typically opportunists hiding in the crowd. While they may or may not have a beef with authorities, their primary goal is not change as with the protesters or even the rioters. Instead, they are using the occasion for the sake of destruction and for theft. Period. These individuals usually show up alongside the rioters in order to use the mayhem to try and hide their crime.

Looters as much as the rioters are responsible for the destruction of property. Most looting happens within the community of the looters since they're familiar with the businesses. Some see it as a means to settle old scores for one reason or another. Others see it as means to level the economic playing field at the expense of their neighbors. The end result is almost always the loss of local businesses, and with them, local jobs, not to mention homes. Thus they only succeed in making their community worse off than before the riots. The best way to think of looters is as social pariahs.

The ability to protest is fundamental in a free and open society, albeit even a moderately one. The Constitution and Bill of Rights establish for the citizens of this country not just the right to express our grievances with the government, but an obligation to do so. We have a duty as citizens to freely speak our minds to the government. To peacefully assemble. To petition and seek redress of injuries inflected upon us by the government, whether intentional or accidental. We also have the right to take matters into our own hands, but only as a last resort.

We do not have the right to destroy property. We do not have the right to steal. We do not have the right to harm another individual except in self-defense. We can disagree with them. We can scream at them. We can even call them names, but we can't physically touch or cause harm them in any way. As jurist Zechariah Chafee Jr is credited with saying in 1919, "Your right to swing your arms ends just where the other man's nose begins".

So, if you're going to protest, have at it. No real change has ever happened without it. Try to have a specific message which includes not just a complaint or accusation, but a solution as well. A complaint without a workable fix is just bitching. Research the problem thoroughly. Get a buy in from other groups if you can, but be careful. Making sure they share similar objectives. Try resolving the matter through the system if possible. If not, protest. Organize it. Get the word out every way you can. Make sure everyone understands the rules---be polite and keep it peaceful. Alert the media.

If you encounter troublemakers, identify and report them (it doesn't hurt to have names and contact information of the media and/or key law enforcement officers handy). Get their names, film them, get pictures, or whatever. Distance yourself and your group as much as you can. If possible, try to discourage others from joining in with rioters and especially looters. If worse comes to worse, disperse your group until another time. Try to follow police instructions. Don't block traffic. That's dangerous and dumb. Lastly, your reputation as a leader and as a group has as much to do with your eventual success as your message or any action you take. Want to know more? Check out our links below.




Crispus Attucks


Storming of the Bastille

Constitutional Rights Foundation: Social Protests


Albert Einstein Institution: 198 Methods of Non-Violent Action (pdf)


ACLU: Know Your Rights: Demonstrations and Protests (pdf)

The Power of Protests: 15 Methods to Make Yourself Heard


Saturday, March 21, 2020

What History Can Teach Us About Dealing with a Crisis...and Hoarders


A lot has already been said about this virus, COVID-19. Perhaps too much. Mainstream media, in its never ending search for ratings (which drives revenue), seems to have got caught up in its own feeding frenzy. The same goes with social media. The speculation and nonsense has become as contagious as the virus itself. I would even dare say that the speculation and hype has done more harm than good.

I'm not saying we shouldn't be informed. We should. In fact, it's very important that we take this pandemic seriously and takes steps to mitigate its spread through some simple changes in how we go about our day. Things like washing your hands thoroughly with soap, reducing your trips to the store, avoiding large crowds as much as possible, staying home if you're sick or think you're getting sick. Again, these are common sense steps we can take to minimize exposure and to slow down the spread of the virus. However, that doesn't seem to be the major problem here.

The biggest issue facing us right now is hoarding. I'm not talking about buying a few extra packages of meat or cans of vegetables or even a few extra rolls of paper towels, cleaning supplies, or the ever important toilet paper. During a natural disaster or bad weather, people routinely run out and buy extra loafs of bread, eggs, milk, and munchies. That's to be expected. But that's not what's happening is it?

The answer is, of course, a definite "no". What we are seeing is Americans at their worse instead of their best. We're seeing Americans panic and act of fear brought on by mainstream and social media. I am talking about people overloading their shopping carts with as many rolls of toilet paper, paper towels, hand sanitizers, and food stuffs (especially meats, canned veggies, bread, and frozen foods) as they can. Then, as if that's not bad enough, they come back for more or raid other stores. They go after things like aspirin or other over the counter medicines. Heck, they're even raiding gun stores and hoarding ammo!

The result is that it creates an artificial shortage, which causes others to panic which in turn, triggers more hoarding and panic. It means that other people---people who might be neighbors, friends, or even family---will get nothing. It means that seniors, the disabled, those with serious medical conditions or those who depend on others as their lifeline will do without. Can you imagine how our parents, grandparents or great grandparents---the "Greatest Generation"---would react our behavior?

They experienced the worse economic downturn this country has ever seen, lasting just over 10 years. With the collapse of the Stock Market and bank closures, many Americans lost practically everything they had. There were no credit cards. Savings accounts were rare and retirement accounts were unheard of. Businesses had massive layoffs or closed, leaving people with no or little steady work. Many were evicted from the their homes or farms as banks, in desperate for cash, called in loans early. People depended on the generosity of others as well as on their own ingenuity to survive.

In the 1930's, 85% of Americans lived on farms. However, the "Dust Bowl" destroyed tens of thousands of farms, which ultimately affected every single American, and with the absence of crops to sell, they couldn't pay their mortgages and there was little to buy at the store. As a result farmers were booted off their farms, leaving behind most of their possessions since there was no way to move them or any place to move them to. Many ended up as sharecroppers, the lowest rung on the agricultural ladder. It was a hand-to-mouth existence.

But despite the hardship, hoarding was unheard of. So too was people fighting over who got the last (or most) of some item. People pulled together to help each other. Soup kitchens sprung up just about everywhere. Even Chicago mobster Al Capone opened up soup kitchens throughout Chicago's Southside. People made room..and time...for each other. Still, it wasn't uncommon to see people, even whole families, living in cars, flop houses, or in cardboard boxes (called "Hoovervilles" after President Hoover.

As if the Great Depression and Dust Bowl weren't bad enough, many who weren't much more than pre-teens and young adults at the time, would soon find themselves going off to war; fighting in the Pacific, North Africa, and Europe. Approximately 420,000 of them would die or get wounded. Worldwide some 75 - 80 million would perish in this war.

At home their parents, family, wives, significant others as well as their children, friends, neighbors and even total strangers pulled together to support the war effort and one another. People accepted shortages. They forwent items they wanted, from nylon to rubber to pots and pans, in order to help the war effort. There were ration coupons for meat, gas, and a whole host of items. Even certain types of clothes, spare parts for cars, and medicine were rationed. There was scrap metal drives along side with war bond drives. Nearly everyone played a part.

People of all religions, races, national origin, economic class and political leaning came together as ordinary Americans helping each other. This self absorbed greed mentality which we're see today would have been unheard of and not well received. Following the end of the war in 1945, those who went off to fight came home to a very different America from the one they had left.

Women were firmly entrenched in the economy as workers. Businesses were more streamlined. Unions were stronger than ever. It seemed that innovations were happening everywhere. The millions of men and women returning from the war were still quite young and were well trained, but for the first time ever, they got the opportunity to go back to school thanks to the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, better known as the "G.I. Bill", and it transformed America. It expanded the Middle Class, created a host of new businesses, the development of suburbia and a hugely successful economy. This was truly our "Greatest Generation", yet they weren't entirely unique.

It was their parents, those who lived through the decades leading up to and after the "war to end all wars", the "Great War" which we commonly refer to as World War One (1914 - 1918) who set the standard. While the U.S. was directly involved for just over a year, Americans wasted no time in coming together to support the war effort, and in doing so, sparked an boom economy known as the "Roaring Twenties".

Women, for the first time in our history, left home not just to become teachers, maids, nurses, secretaries or employed in textile, but to work in the factories building cars, operating drill presses, cranes, driving trucks and so forth . Some took over the businesses their fathers or husbands left behind. This gave them a new found sense of personal freedom and self-confidence their mothers and grandmothers never experienced, not to mention the pride of earning their own paycheck. It was in no small part that this helped to motivate them to achieve the vote (which they did in 1920).

The "Great War" also triggered many new innovations, especially in aviation, automobile manufacturing, industry, roads, communications, and in particular, medicine, which were to be tested in the extreme. Just as the war was showing signs of coming to a close, a new and unexpected enemy emerged. This one would prove to be more widespread and lethal than the one being fought in the air, trenches or at sea.

This unknown enemy soon had a name; a most unusual name. It was called H1N1. It became better known as the "Spanish Flu" and it would kill an estimated 40 million people worldwide, more than those killed or wounded in the "Great War" (as an aside, it struck in two devastating waves between January 1918 and December 1920).

To put it in better perspective, the Spanish Flu killed more people in 24 weeks than HIV/AIDs killed in 24 years. Only the "Black Death" of the 14th Century killed more people with estimates ranging as high as 200 million people (in Europe as much as 60% of the population was affected. It took nearly 200 years for Europe to recover). The Spanish Flu was what our great grandparents faced and it was terrifying. By the time it was over, it had killed more Americans than were lost in both world wars combined.

Our great grandparents had never faced anything like this. They lacked the medicines and treatments that we take for granted. But as frightening and deadly as this was, they found ways to come together as a nation. Americans did what we've always done. We looked out for each other as best as we could. We checked on the elderly to make sure there were okay, even if it meant walking several miles to do so (or, as often as not, hitching up a wagon and bringing them what we thought they might need). We looked in on expecting mothers or on those with young children (back then almost everyone had "young children" since large families were common).

The one thing we don't read much of is mass hysteria. Naturally they were afraid, but they fought through whatever fears they had, and part of that was by depending on each other. I read through several articles about this pandemic and noticed something else which was missing. That was talk about hoarding. Once again, people respected each other to the point where they were willing to share what little they had. Back then that might have meant exchanging canned goods or food stuffs like venison, milk, cheese or perhaps doing something in-kind like making a quilt or fixing a broken chair.

Perhaps this was simply a different America or maybe it was simply a different kind of American. Individuals who were more self-reliant but at the same time more than willing to help a friend, neighbor, or even a stranger. Don't get me wrong. In looking around America today, I see acts of kindness and generosity in abundance. Nevertheless, what I'm also seeing are acts of pure greed, selfishness, and a disregard for others.

I see individuals acting purely out of selfish self-interest; many of whom whose sole intent is to take advantage of others. I fully expect to see all these opportunistic parasites trying to sell their toilet paper, paper towels, cleaning supplies, and can goods online on sites like EBay or in yard sales and flea markets at greatly marked up prices. Meanwhile, others are forced to do without, especially seniors, the handicapped or have serious pre-existing medical conditions and may be limited in their ability to get out and shop; the very individuals who are most vulnerable and afraid.

In many ways these hoarders are nothing more than vultures preying on the weak. They are thieves who have used their greed to steal from all of us. In previous times of revolutionary in places like France, Spain, Germany, and Russia, these types of individuals were often rounded up and shot or hanged by authorities, that is if their fellow citizens didn't beat them to death first. Even in the postwar South, hoarders were viewed little different than were looters...and were often treated the same way.

We need to strongly discourage hoarding. We need to call them out; to publicly shame them. They serve no one but themselves. Stores need to restrict purchases to curtail hoarding. In its place, we need to encourage compassion for others. We need to check in on our senior and those who are sick or disabled. If we can't do it in person or by phone, then ask authorities to do so. We need to be the kind of American we once were and can be again.



How the Horrific 1918 Flu Spread Across America


History: The Great Depression



The Library of Economics and Liberty: Great Depression



Women in the Factories




Thursday, July 04, 2019

The Fourth of July and a Few Things to Bear in Mind.


On this Fourth of July, let us remember a certain event involving one of our most beloved Founding Fathers, Benjamin Franklin. The deliberations of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 were held in strict secrecy. Consequently, anxious citizens gathered outside of what would become Independence Hall. When the proceedings ended, in order to learn what had been produced behind closed doors,
dozens gathered close by the doorway to question anyone they could. One of the first to emerge was Benjamin Franklin. A Mrs. Powell of Philadelphia asked Franklin, "Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, "A republic madam, if you can keep it". A democratically elected representative republic, if, as he said, we could keep it.

We did for many generations; through wars--foreign and domestic, good times economically and bad ones as well. We fought and argued among ourselves, but we kept our democratic republic nevertheless. But then something happened. Something changed about how we were governed, or perhaps it was us who changed. Maybe it was the rise of divisive factions; political cliques, better know as political parties which our Founding Fathers largely opposed that increasingly divided us. Perhaps it was the rise of a super wealthy business class which sought to usurp the power of the government. Regardless, the power bequest to us by the Founders began to slip from our hands. We dropped the levers of power and picked up television remotes or video joysticks to waste hours at a time instead of paying attention to what was being done in our name.

While we were busy watching "reality" television, sports, and playing on our video games, America slipped into an Oligarchy. A wealthy elite took control of our government. Free speech was replaced with money; whoever has the most shouts the loudest. Those elected or appointed to serve the People now serve new masters--corporations. Power today is maintained not by the Will of the People, but by corporate money, partisan gerrymandering, no term limits, and in many cases no direct recourse such as citizen referendums or voter initiatives. Our democratic republic experiment is little more than a shell now; something we try and pretend is real much like the ancient Romans did after the rise of the Caesars until such time as the farce could no longer be maintained. Today we struggle to define what it means to be an American Citizen or whether we have the right to secure or even have borders!

So, let's take a few minutes from the festivities of the day to remember why we fought a revolution against the world's mightiest nation at the time. It was over taxation without us having a say. It was over censorship of the media and our right to say what we believed, including the right to criticize those in government without fear of reprisal. It was over corruption of government officials, be it in the form of bribes, "loans", or voting themselves pay increases. It was over the right to worship in the faith of our choice, or even having the right to have no religious beliefs at all. It was, after all, the sovereignty of the individual with mattered the most.

It was over ending abuse by government troops who acted as the police of their time, including being forced to provide for their welfare. It was over the right to know what crimes we were charged with should we be arrested, and to face those who accused of these crimes. It was also over the right to a speedy trial rather than to spend months or even years in jails. It was over the right to posses firearms; not just to hunt with, but as our last resort against tyranny; the same tyranny which sought to deprive us of our other rights.

Friday, July 10, 2015

When in Doubt Banish Reality and Embrace the Illusion

The Confederate flag had nothing to do with the actions of Mr. Roof. It was and remains the symbol of Southern independence, state's rights, and what they believed was the original intent of the Founding Fathers (did you know that the majority of descendents of the Founding Fathers at that time supported the position of the Confederate government and its Constitution?). The fact it has been hijacked by hate groups and wackos should not detour our respect for the flag any more than the fact the these same groups are now using the American and Gladsen flags. Should these be banned too? What about the bible? It condones slavery, ethnic bigotry, and murder. Want to ban it too? Mr. Roof was wearing a Gold's Gym t-shirt. Are they racist? Wanna ban their t-shirts? Of course not, but that's how out of hand this has become. I will do what I can to allow it to stay while fighting racist groups like the KKK, Neo-Nazis, Nation of Islam, the New Black Panthers, and a corrupt government.

That is what I wrote in a earlier article dear readers. Well, it's gone. The "Southern Cross", which had flown over South Carolina for 154 years will now be consigned to a museum. It's also amazing at just how fast South Carolina was willing to turn its head on its past and its heritage. How is it we can't act this quickly and decisively at the really serious issues like hunger, homelessness, a collapsing infrastructure, or sputtering education system where mediocrity is now seen acceptable or a corrupted government? Are we so easily duped--be it out of fear of "offending" someone or the threat of a imposed "guilt"? Where are our leaders---the ones with backbone and a willingness to speak the truth without fear of condemnation because it's the right thing to do? It's been amazing to see just how easy it was to convince a people that their ancestry was so corrupt that it must now be hidden or destroyed, and how they so willingly---almost anxiously---complied and choose to remove their the symbols of their heritage. Sheep willingly being lead to the slaughter. A people so willing to forget their past will have no future except the one dictated to them by others. That a people should be willing to accept a guilt not of their own making; a guilt that never really existed in the sense it has been presented. Is this "white privilege" or is it "white guilt"? The two are becoming harder to distinguish between.

This nonsense over the Confederate flag, statues, monuments, and tombstones has gotten totally out of hand; another "manufactured" event to distract us. This was simply government by deception. It's part and parcel of rule by our oligarch overlords. We are not to notice those behind the financial curtain. It's amazing how quickly the American People were so easily distracted from a violent crime which killed nine individuals in their church, including the minister to pictures of a flag being held by the accused killer, Dylann Roof, on the Internet. He was wearing a Gold's-Gym t-shirt too. Shouldn't we go after them? After all, they promote good health and fitness. Surely there are enough couch potatoes out there who feel "offended" at what Gold's Gym represents and can put down the Twinkies or bag of chips long enough to mount a "couch-in" campaign!

Right now, there are groups and individuals who seriously considering digging up long dead Confederates and their families, and doing what with their bones exactly? Dumping them in a "undisclosed location" like the Russians claimed to have done with the remains of Joseph Goebbels and his family? Certainly that's the symbolism they would like for us to associate with them. I guess we should ask the Memphis City Council since they seem to be the first on the bandwagon. They voted to remove the remains of Confederate Nathan Bedford Forrest and his wife from the local cemetery. I suppose next will General Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson, or J.E.B. Stuart. I wonder what they'll do about General Lee? Nothing says "Confederate" as much as the greatest general on either side as "The Gray Fox". Of course, there's three little bitty problems. First, the Northern Army seized Lee's estate near the end of the war and turned it into a giant gravesite. Perhaps you've heard of it. Arlington National Cemetery? And then there's the fact that Lee didn't own any slaves, or that he was a noted US officer during the war with Mexico. But what the hell, he wore a gray uniform so let's dig him up too, and while we're at, let pull up his horse, "Traveler"! There's nothing better than beating a dead horse and a dead rebel. Jefferson Davis's home in Fairfield Kentucky has already been burned down, so forget that. There's a marker about slavery, which he renounced, at the site already. Surely we can still dig his moldy old corpse up and give it a good beating; you know, just for sport.

In Frankfort, there's a old statue of this Kentucky native in the basement of the state capitol, who, before the war, was considered one of the brightest and best Senator in the nation; the intellectual heir to fellow Kentuckian Henry Clay or fellow Southerner John C. Calhoun; who opposed succession, but believed in state's rights. Now there's discussion of removing it from the building. I suppose it will used for filler just like the ancient Egyptian pharaohs did to other pharaohs who had fallen out of favor. I suppose it will be replaced by someone who is currently more "PC" as they say. Nothing says "Stalinism" like good ole revisionism. Did you know that MTV is releasing another so-called "reality TV" show called "White People" (as there doesn't appear to be any decent music being made anymore)? Apparently, based on the trailer, it's about just how evil, vile, greedy and contemptible white people are. Yelp, whites are devil's spawn. The trailer depicts young college age white folks having to confront their "whiteness" and shows some getting up and leaving the room--in tears of repressed guilt obviously. Perhaps President Obama will come to their rescue after giving them a good deserving dressing down, after which they write a suitably sized certified check (they're greedy and untrustworthy after all).

I wonder if this how nations fall? With people being pitted against each other in manufactured conflicts, either domestically or globally in order that they are distracted from the corrupt and corruption of a government that's no longer their own. I suppose if people are so busy fighting each other over issues which either don't exist or don't matter, they don't stop and notice how bad things around them are or who's really responsible. We've given them our democratic republic without so much as a putting down the remote and they gave us a fascist oligarchy (rule by the corporations for the interests of the 1%) and the onset of a police state---for our own protection of course--- against a never ending "war on terror" for fun and profit (especially profit). Besides, it artificially boosts the economy, while "bleeding" off an excess population and magically lowers unemployment numbers while it helps the government rid itself of troublemakers and that pesky Constitution.

So friends, just follow the shiny objects put before you; watch your so-called "reality TV"; play your video games; watch your sports
and the pabulum they call "news"; embrace a dumbed down education system and excuses for failure, laziness, and mediocrity as the standard to aim for, after all, someone else is always to blame; accept the choices they allow you and the "guilt" they hoist on your shoulders; don't think and never ever ask questions. Remember, they know what's in your best interests. To paraphrase George Orwell, in a time where lies are accepted as the truth, those who speak the truth will be seen as liars. So just move along.


Saturday, October 18, 2014

Wanted: Ebola Czar---No Medical Experience Required


Approximately 15 countries have now restricted travel into and out of countries affected by the Ebola virus; most of these are in surrounding African nations. 7 airlines, including Air France, British Airways, Emirates Airlines, and Korean Air, have restricted air travel as well. Why? Because it makes good common sense to stop the spread of Ebola and keep it out of their country. 2/3 of Americans are not only concerned about the spread of Ebola since its introduction to our shores was authorized by President Obama, but the same percentage---67%---demand travel restrictions be imposed. Good luck with that America. Obama won't even secure our southern border against illegal immigrates. and whatever illnesses they're carrying.

But what the Obama has done, however, is appoint a so-called "Ebola Czar" or as he's officially called the "Ebola Response Coordinator". His name is Ron Klain, and he's the quintessential Washington insider. Mr. Klain is pretty bright boy. He was born in Indianapolis, Indiana in 1961 and attended Georgetown University before going on to Harvard Law School, where he graduated cum laude. His background includes working in the Clinton Administration as the Chief of Staff to then head of the Justice Department, Janet Reno (think Waco). He later worked in as Chief of Staff to Vice Presidents Al Gore and Joe Biden. He also worked on the presidential campaigns of Wesley Clark and John Kerry. Klain has been a senior advisor to Barack Obama, and worked as General Counsel for an Wallstreet investment firm, Revolution, LLC, which was co-founded by AOL's Steve Case.

Klain was a chief legal advisor to help Fannie Mae avoid "regulatory issues" just before the big housing market bubble burst and Taxpayers got to pick up the pieces . He later signed off on the Obama Regime's ill-advised $535 million dollar loan guarantee to the now defunct solar panel manufacturer, Solyndra; a loan that US Taxpayers' had to eat.

His wife, Monica Medina, also an attorney, is a environmental activist. She is a former senior director of Ocean Policy at the National Geographic Society. She has been general counsel for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); Principal Director at NOAA; and Special Assistant to the Secretary of Defense

All-in-all, very impressive credentials. I should point out that I mention Medina's background only to highlight her professional background and "insider" resume. However, you'll note that neither has any experience dealing with medical matters. Mr. Klain lacks any background---education or training---in dealing with epidemics, especially of this dimension or even health administration. He apparently has no clue about emergency health management; medical logistics; treatment or prevention; or even emergency management.

In short, Obama has put a bagboy in charge of containing the plague. You would think, when faced with something as contagious and deadly as Ebola, that you would want someone knowledgeable of infectious diseases or emergency medical management to be in charge (and in case you're wondering, the CDC is not in charge. It is serving only in an advisory role, and then only if its assistance is requested. Thus far, it's response have been substandard to say the least). Nope, Obama has given the job of protecting America's health to a political insider and a investment lawyer. Meanwhile, the "Blunder-in-Chief" continues to standby his refusal to issue restrictions on air travel. I'm beginning to wonder if we shouldn't change the name of this plague from "Ebola" to "Obola".

Every Country in Africa...
http://offgridsurvival.com/ebolaclosingborders/

Americans want flight restrictions from Ebola countries.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/10/14/americans-want-flight-restrictions-from-ebola-countries-and-its-not-close/

Ron Klain
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Klain


And the Survey Says...!

A/O endeavors to remain of the leading national non-partisan centrist oriented political blog. In our ever continuing effort to bring you articles that you want to read, we've come up with a brief survey. If you would, please a take few moments to answer these few questions. If you'd like to add anything more, please feel free to add a comment or email them direct to me at PaulHosse@aol.com. The poll questions are to your top right. Thanks much!