One of America's leading Independent political sources for those who think for themselves
Monday, January 05, 2015
Is America Racist?
People of all races have been guilty of it and many, if not all, remain guilty of it whether they want to admit it or not. Some say that a minority can never get be accused of being racist; only a majority race can. Really? How does the size of one's race composition define the attitude toward another race, especially when racial sizes tend to vary? I am a white male. Am I a racist? No, of course not. But if one believes that's due, at least in part, to the fact that whites are the majority population in this country, bear in mind that white males are officially a minority according to the US Census Bureau. Therefore, I and my other fellow white males would fail to meet the criteria for a racist. In fact, over the next 10 to 15 years, whites in general will only be a large minority; essentially on par with Hispanics while blacks, now the third largest racial group, will drop further and will actually be fourth behind Asians in some locations. So, I guess that definition would make all of us racists wouldn't it?
Over the past 10 or 20 so years, most people have come to accept that we have become "post-racial", and I think to a point that's been true. Certainly, we have mixed racial dating, not to mention mixed racial marriages and mixed racial children (in fact, multiple race children are not uncommon). Having friends, neighbors, co-workers of different races is so common places as not to even be noticed. Back in the early 1960's and earlier, it would have nearly been unheard of to have a black, or Asian, or even Hispanic supervisor (for that matter, even a female supervisor). Today, no one even notices. Once we would never have had an elected official who wasn't white (or even female). That's hard to even comprehend today isn't it? For that matter, we would never see a TV ad or show with a minority playing anything but a minor (and usually stereotypical part. I am reminded of the great hoofer, Bill "Bojangles" Robinson, who was considered by many, including Ginger Rogers, Gene Kelly, and Fred Astaire, as the greatest song and dance man ever to have graced the stage, yet he still had to use the backdoor to enter the set).
Today, not only are blacks, but Asians and Hispanics on par with whites in every regard---employment, entertainment, politics, the military, but in many respects, elevated beyond whites. We have funds set up exclusively for blacks, Native Americans, Asians and Hispanics. We have not only TV and radio show aimed at racial audiences, we have entire media networks such as BET or Univision, as well hundreds of magazines, plus music and book genres within more "mainstream" multiracial venues like the Grammys, Miss America Pageant, and the Oscars, but also have their own stand alones like BET Music Awards, Miss Black America, Black Entrepreneur Awards, in addition to the Hispanic and Asian art and entertainment awards. There are law enforcement associations for blacks, Asians, and Hispanics, as well as social activist organizations such as NAACP and La Raza. Politically, we have Hispanic, Asian, and black caucuses and associations to focus on the issues of their specific racial constituents. There are even affirmative hiring laws on the books that give preference based on race rather than individual qualifications, plus loan and federal contract guarantees aimed at certain racial groups.
However, there are no such comparative organizations for whites (actually, I found over 100 organizations each dedicated to Asians, blacks and Hispanics. There was just one dedicated to whites (at least one not designated as a "hate" group by the Southern Poverty Law Institute). This was a "white only" scholarship fund providing $250 to qualified applicants. It was shut down in 2013. There are no white only awards, TV or radio shows let alone networks or stations. There are no white only college organizations or funding. There are no white only professional associations or musical or book genres, and there's most certainly no Miss White America or NAAWP. Therefore, if social participation and/or representation are the basis for determining racial profiling and thus racism, then whites fail to meet these guidelines. Still looking for "White Privilege"? I don't think you're going to find it. Nevertheless, of late we have seen the deaths of three individuals blamed on racism because the multiple races were involved. We've also seen looting (blatant theft) and the destruction of businesses, yet in most cases, it was individuals of the same race torching and robbing others of the same race, and yet again, there are charges of racism raised. What gives?
Three situations. Similar only in that it involved a white police officer and a black victim. Independent investigation into each (which included members of the victim's racial community) revealed three distinct outcomes. In the first (Brown), it was determined that the officer was justified in the use of deadly force. In the second (Garner), it was determined that while the officer didn't nothing specifically wrong. In the third case (Rice), the actions of that officer resulted in his dismissal and may likely (and should) result in prosecution. Personally, I agree with the outcome of the Brown and Rice cases, however, in Garner's case, it sure looked like a chokehold to me and I'm former military, and even if he had a lenghty rap sheet, that's still no reason to die.
Organizations of Asian Descents in North America
Black Organizations and Organizations serving the Black Community
The Actual Facts of the Eric Garner Case
11 Facts About the Eric Garner Case the Media Won't tell You
'Black brunch' protestors interrupt diners in NYC, Oakland
Posted by Paul Hosse at 1/05/2015 02:04:00 PM
Labels: African Americans, Asians, black brunch, Blacks, corporate media, Crime, Eric Garner, Ferguson MO, Hispanics, looting, Michael Brown, minorities, NYC, Politics, post-racial, Protests, racism, Tamir Rice, Whites
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment