Remember this too. The Nazis came to power under the banner
of "law and order" and national security with just 43% of the total
vote. Lacking a majority, the Nazi's were compelled into a coalition government with
industrialist Alfred Hugenberg's conservative German National People's Party
(DNVP) in order to take power. But
once the Enabling Act was in place by March 23,1933, the ill-conceived response to the February 27th Reichstag fire allegedly started by "Communists agitators", the German
Republic was all but over. And it took Hitler
just 52 days.
The Democrats and Republicans are both minority parties with
roughly 25% of registered voters each. but you wouldn't know it from the media or how the country is run. They've created a two tier legal system
and a political class system. They've quietly overthrown our Republic at the behest of a neo-fascist corporatocracy led a super rich oligarchy (or
kleptocracy if you prefer, it really doesn't matter. The results for us are the
same), and while we were busy playing on our "smart phones" or
watching some reality show.
Freedoms are routinely and gradually suppressed in the name of "national
security" in order to protect the populace from scapegoat enemy. Historically it's been the "Jews",
Protestants or Catholics, blacks, Chinese, the Irish, and so on. But, it need
not be a group, it can just as easily be a abstract idea; a "catch all"
if you will. For instance, "socialism" and Communism" are
typically bandied about as if they're one and the same, which they're obviously
not. But none of that really matters as long as you're made afraid of it. Why?
The corporate state will always employ a "us versus
them" mindset using every resource they have available in order to make
and keep you afraid of something. They will use that fear to justify their existence.
It will be the foundation of their control.
What about Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits
discrimination based on age, race, gender, national origin, religion, or sexual
orientation, or the 19th Amendment (passed in 1919) giving women the vote? How about the Federal Unemployment Act of 1935
which provides unemployment benefits to out of work employees or the Indian
Mineral Leasing Act of 1938 which gave Native American tribes more control of
the extraction of natural resource on tribal land. Give up?
Every single one of them were labeled either
"socialist" or Communist. Every. Single. One. Most of these were
passed during Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration, which didn't go unnoticed
by the powerful industrial elites of the time who ridiculed Roosevelt as a
"traitor to his class" (he came from a wealthy upper New York
family), as a closet socialist or Communist (take your pick). Wall Street did
everything it could (legal or not) to defeat, or at least delay these laws, but
ultimately failed. But, can you honestly say your life would be better off
without most or all of these laws?
But it doesn't end there. Not by a long shot. The Civil
Rights Act of 1964, and "War on Poverty" initiative signed by the Democratic President, Lyndon B
Johnson, was vilified as being a Communist plot to destabilize the country as
was the creation of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965. The Consumer Product Safety Act, Clean Air and
Clean Water acts on 1972, all of which were signed by Republican arch
conservative Richard Nixon, were also hailed as being "socialist". Of
course, "Obamacare" which help
provide critical medical care for those without any (in many cases because
their employer couldn't afford to offer any).
It's the same in every
totalitarian government. Different
actors. Same script. As Nazi
propagandist genius, Joseph Goebbels, once advised "publicly accuse your
enemy of doing what you're already secretly doing". Our "Enabling
Act" arrived in 2001 under the flag
waving title of "The Patriot Act" and we've never looked backed despite the slow
transformation of the U.S. into a surveillance state. Fascism, in all its
incarnations---populist, traditional, benevolent, or religious, all ends the
same. It's about control.
Echoing that statement, James Waterman Wise Jr , author of
numerous books including "Our Bill of Rights: What it Means To Me"
and "Thomas Jefferson: Then and Now" penned in the Feb. 5, 1936 edition of Christian Century (considered the flagship magazine of mainstream
Protestantism since 1900). He remarked, "If fascism comes, it will not be
identified with any 'shirt' movement, nor with an insignia, but it will
probably be 'wrapped in the American flag and heralded as a plea for liberty
and preservation of the constitution".
These "friendly fascists" might claim to know the "Will of God" and
promise to return us to time of more traditional family values. Such is "friendly fascism". It may claim to be socially conservative if
that is what it takes to get your compliance just as easily as it claims to be "all
inclusive". But regardless of its outward message, Fascism will always
ultimately insist on your total and
unwavering compliance.
The assault on our nation has been a gradual one. It creeps
forward in one place and makes a strategic
but temporary retreat in others areas, but overall, their agenda always advances.
It's a process known as "incrementalism" or "gradualism". Notice
for instance how the educational system have been "dumb down". Did it
happened over a month or even a year? Nope. It's been happening over decades.
Schools have gone from teaching critical thinking skills to
teaching "Critical Race Theory". Some of these same schools are now
encouraging "gender selection" by kids who barely know what "gender"
means! Worse still is that the parents don't even have to be notified. Schools
and libraries are trying to ban certain American classics such as "Huckleberry
Finn", "Tom Sawyer" , "1984" and "Animal
Farm", "Of Mice and Men", "To Kill a Mockingbird", and
"A Farewell to Arms" . Even "Little Riding Hood" and Anne
Frank's "Diary of a Young Girl" have fallen to censors!
This, of course, raises the question as to where books should
be banned at all? Perhaps we should go back to the age specific criteria for
children is strictly enforced just as all decisions made about students should
involve the parent. After all, isn't the
ultimate objective to encourage kids to read, develop their critical thinking
skills, expand their intellectual horizons and help make them responsible
citizens?
People are expected (and in some places, mandated by law) to
play along with other people's fantasies by referring to a biological male who "identifies" as a female as
"she/her" or by female who believes they're a male as
"he/him". Even more oddly, some don't even want to be referred by a
gender specific pronoun since they're "gender fluid" and want to be
known as "them/they", but it gets weirder.
There are those individuals who "self-identify" as
animals---dogs, cats, whatever---and they want to be treated that way. Some
even show up in school dressed as the animal of their delusion...err..choice...
and wants act, be talked to, and even fed from a bowl at lunch (I wonder if they go outside to the restroom,
sniff other people's butts, or if they've figured out how to lick their
privates yet?).
Anyway, I don't care who or what someone believes that are, although much of this I believe is a cry of
attention or simply a mental illness. It's really none of my business, but why must
I have to reinforce their self-delusion and play along? What about my moral compass?
If we're are pitted against each other, then we won't be
paying attention to what they're doing. In a short order, the mask will slip
and then drop completely and you can bet they won't bother even asking for our support or anything else. They
will demand and you will comply.
In that same instant, when they finally stop pretending to
care about rising gas and food prices, the environment, unemployment, high
taxes, or having an open border, you will have to decide for yourself, for your
family, and for grandchildren yet unborn if it's better to stand on your feet and
take a unmovable stand as a free man or women to fight for democracy and a
return of our Republic, or to live forever on your knees having never knowing
freedom ever again. Remember, no
decision is still a decision by default. But for those who come after you, it
will be far too late. The decision will have already been made for them by your
inaction.
As Dr. Klaus Schwab of
the globally powerful and influential World Economic Forum recently said, when
speaking about the WEF's "Great Reset Initiative", that "you
will own nothing and be happy". Another aspect of the "Great
Reset" is to create a more "sustainable planet" by promoting
greater economic deregulation of businesses, and in particular large transnational
corporations (of the corporatocracy type) and giving them a greater role in global
governance "at the expense of government". Does that sound like "socialism" or
"Communism"? Not to me. In fact, it's almost the textbook definition
of fascism.
There's no question that America has slipped into a
corporatocracy under the leadership of a group of mega-rich oligarchs. They thrive on creating chaos and promising us order. Their
sole goal is control, be it assets, resources, or us as their economic
serfs, forever chained to debt. Our "worth" determined by our credit
rating and to afraid to speak up for ourselves for fear of losing our jobs. A roadmap is already being laid out for us and
those who follow who will "own
nothing and be happy". Will you willingly go down that road or will you fight to preserve our democracy and for a return of our Republic? We have to get this right the first time.
If you enjoyed
the article, please consider passing it along to others and don't forget to
subscribe. It's free! Lastly please be sure to "like" us on
whatever platform you use to read anotheropinionblog.com. It helps beat the
algorithms and keeps our articles in circulation. Thank you!
Dept of Labor: Summary of Major Laws of the Department ofLabor
openDemocracy: Conspiracy theories aside, there's something fishy about the Great Reset
25 of America's most unexpectedly banned books
Independent Party ID Tied for High; Democratic Party for NewLow
No comments:
Post a Comment