Well, in a sense, the former President is
correct. It has become an ideological and partisan issue in that the solution
for Democrats and those on the Left is circumvent the 2nd Amendment in every
way possible. They would like to make it illegal to own certain types of rifles
simply because their stock has a military design such as the AR 15.
The media would have you believe that
this is some sort of military grade firearm that somehow
magically made its way into the hands of the public. For the record, an AR 15
doesn't stand for "Assault Rifle"
or "Automatic Rifle". It stands for "ArmaLite
Rifle", the name of the original manufacturer, which is modeled after a
military M-14 rifle.
The AR 15 is a semi-automatic rifle, the
kind of which that have been around for decades and commonly for hunting or
target shooting. Pretty much every manufacturer produces some sort of
semi-automatic rifle. The only real difference here is the design of the stock
which is intended to give it more of a "wow" factor.
The Left is also wanting to make it much
more difficult to purchase handguns of all makes and models, if not outlaw them
altogether. There has even been some
discussion by Democrats in Congress to require active duty and former military
as well as law enforcement members to undergo special psychiatric exams before being allowing to purchase any
firearms, especially handguns.
Conservatives, as expected, deeply oppose any additional restrictions to gun ownership. They see it as an attempt to do away with gun ownership in piecemeal fashion until the average citizen is no longer able to own any firearms. They believe that the 2nd Amendment guarantees the right of all citizens to own a firearm, whether it be for hunting, target shooting, self-protection or no particular reason at all. But more so, as a bulwark against a tyrannical government as expressly stated by the Founding Fathers.
To paraphrase the likes of George Washington,
Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison on the subject, a unarmed and unprepared
populace is no longer a nation of citizens. It is a nation of subjects. They
feared that any government, including the one they just created, could become
despotic just as they feared the creation of political parties. As Benjamin Franklin said, "Democracy is
two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed
lamb contesting the vote".
However, what this actually comes down to
is, as Obama suggests, a matter of urban versus rural and ultimately, one of
race. The truth is that Black youth are
five times more likely than any other racial group to be murdered. They are
also more likely to be murdered by another Black person than they are a white,
Hispanic, or Asian. Whites and Hispanic youths are killed at a rate of 2.3 per
100,000. The percentage for Asian deaths is .90 per 100,000, while for black
youth it's 11.8 per 100,000.
Statistics from a 2018 FBI report shows
that 16% of white victims were killed by Black attackers while 8% of Black
victims had white attackers. However, in crimes in general, in 80% of the cases
where the victim was white, the perpetrator was also white. When it came to Black
victims, the perpetrator was Black in 89% of the cases. Among Black youth, 8
out of 10 deaths by gun were homicides. The majority of which were committed by
another Black individual.
A 2016 study conducted by the American
Journal of Preventive Medicine examined 812 deaths in 17 states from 2009
through 2012 which involved law enforcement. The study showed that white
individuals were more likely to be the victim of a police shooting than not. In
fact, whites represented 52% of the deaths. Black deaths by a law enforcement
officer represented just 32.4%, making white deaths 2.8% higher than that of
blacks.
It should be pointed out that in 83% of the time, the victim was armed when shot by law enforcement. Black victims, however, were most often reported to be unarmed---18.4%---of the time compared to white victims, who were unarmed just 9.4% of the time. In addition, the report mentioned that black males were killed by law enforcement 2.5 times more often than their white counterparts. Black females were killed at a rate of 1.4 times more often than white females.
Could this be part of the cultural issue
Obama spoke of? There is no question that Hispanics tend to avoid law
enforcement. Many come from countries that have a long history of brutal and
corrupt law enforcement officials where rape, extortion, bribery, and even
murder are not unknown. Asians too have a fear and distrust of law enforcement
for much the same reasons. Of course, in both cases, language differences add
another layer of mistrust.
For whites, it's different. Most police
officers and law enforcement officials are white. In fact, 60% of police
officers are white. Historically, that number has been much higher. Hispanics
make up about 18.2% while 12.9% of
police officers are Black and just 3.3% are Asian. Native Americans make
up only 1%.
As
an aside, the number of white officers has declined since roughly 2019 while Hispanic
officers have increased slightly since 2020, which also marks the same point
where the number of Black police officers started to decline. The number of
Asian and Native American officers has remained consistent.
It's worth pointing out that males
comprise 83.2% of all police officers while females make up 16.8%. Also, female
officers earn, on average, just 94 cents for every dollar her male counterpart
earns. The average salary for a male officer is $54,340 and $51,038 for female
officers.
But what about Black culture? Why do blacks have higher percentage of arrests and fatalities when it comes to their dealings with law enforcement? Are they just unlucky and get caught more readily? The short answer is "no". While Asians and Hispanics have keenly developed distrust of law enforcement, both cultures have a strong appreciation for authority and authority figures in general. The same can be said of whites.
All three groups were historically taught
from a young age to respect and follow authority figures, which was often
reinforced at home. It was common when I was growing up to seek out a police
officer or fireman if you were lost or in trouble. Neighbors would watch out
for trouble and thought nothing of calling your parents to rat you out if you did
something wrong. Churches and other religious institutions were another source
of reinforcing the concept of authority. Schools too practiced strong
discipline and misbehavior of any sort wasn't tolerated.
However, this same level of compliance
toward authority seems to be missing within the Black community. What happened?
Part of the reason is due to the fact that typically white, Asian, and Hispanic
households included two parents, and often grandparents, aunts, uncles, and
lots of kids! It wasn't uncommon for extended family to live nearby and often
visited. So, there was at least a stable family life.
In Black households, this wasn't always the case. In 2011, 72% of Black households consisted of single mothers. In 2016, 48% of all non-Black households were married while just 28% of Black households were. According to one telling statistic, in 1925 Harlem New York, 85% of Black households had two parents. By 1965, following the introduce of various welfare programs, out-of-wedlock births had increased 25% among Blacks.
By 1991, that figure was 68%. As of 2017, it was 77.3%, the most of any
racial demographic. This meant that Black children were disproportionately
growing up without a father figure in their lives. It also means that most had
little adult supervision during critical stages in their lives. While schools
and other institutions attempted to fill the gap, they are no substitute for
the traditional two parent family.
39% of Black children do not live with their biological father. 28% have no male role model in their lives, compared to 15% of white children. 32% of Black fathers have never visited their biological children as opposed to 11% of white fathers. As a result, black children lack a key stabilizing factor in their lives.
As an aside, 50% of Blacks have never
been married compared to 33% of all other racial groups. Black males,
interestingly, were also more likely--15%---to marry non-black women compared
to just 7% of Black women who married outside their race.
It's also worth nothing that single
parent households are quickly on the rise among Hispanic women in the United
States despite a history where out-of-wedlock births carried a strong religious
and societal stigma. In Latin America for instance, the trend is spreading in
spite of its strong Catholic traditions. 84% of births in Columbia are
out-of-wedlock. Mexico, Chile, and Argentina have similar percentages. However,
this doesn't mean the absence of a father figure, which remains a key element
in Hispanic culture. Meanwhile, this trend has yet to appear in the Asian
community.
Another key factor contributing to gun
violence among the Black community, especially as it relates to the police, is
a toxic culture toward institutional authority in general, and toward law
enforcement in particular. It can even be found in some of the music Black
youth and young adults tend to listen to (mainly "gangsta rap") which
often glorifies guns, drugs, rape, and murder, especially of police officers.
Certain rap performers also promotes what
is termed as "savage" or extreme rude behavior toward authority
figures. This is often reinforced through peer pressure, which can be quite
powerful among teenagers. It can be seen in schools, in malls, neighborhoods and
reinforced in movies and video games, while the media (mainstream and Black
oriented) has been persistently promoting a subculture of entitlement or
victimhood coupled with the creation of "identity politics", a term
which developed out of a 1977 statement made by the Combahee River Collective,
a black feminist lesbian socialist group.
Identity politics creates false sense of separateness
as if one particular group stands uniquely alone with its problems and thus
develops a "us vs. them" mentality which pits them against everyone
else. At the same time, the media has
sought to create a corresponding culture of subservience, manufactured
"guilt", willfully ignoring or excusing the "savage"
behavior by other racial groups. The media also tends to underreport or
downplay certain acts of violence or inappropriate behavior in order to create
a false sense of normalcy.
Former President Obama is correct in his assessment. The rise in deaths among Black youth, and indeed, the increase in Black related crime and violence, is indeed as cultural as it is racial or ideological. We essentially have two competing cultures which are, at their core, the product of fractured families, the result of the unintended failure of various government programs, and a taught sense of distrust of authority figures, which is reinforced through misguided media, plus a glorification of anti-social behavior and "political correctness". Even in public schools, academic achieving black students are often harassed verbally or physically for "acting white".
So, what does all this mean? It means
that Blacks experience a higher rate of gun related deaths any other racial
group. It also means they are more likely to be the victim of a crime where the
perpetrator also happens to be Black as well. They are also more likely to be the
victim of law enforcement related deaths than not, particularly if they're male.
Percentage wise, they have highest number of individuals behind bars, largely
based on drug or felony. The media has perpetuated a sense of persecution and entitlement
while excusing anti-social behavior.
Nevertheless, the issue of gun control is, at
its heart, aimed at controlling the spread of gun related violence. On one
hand, gun control advocates believe that by taking guns out of the hands of all
citizens, criminals would also voluntarily surrender their guns or obtaining
guns would be more difficult to acquire. The end result would be a reduction
crime in general. They believe that the 2nd Amendment is outdated and/or misconstrued.
By forgoing this unnecessary freedom, it would be a small price to pay in order
to create a less violent society. A case of sacrificing one freedom for the
greater good of all.
Those who are pro 2nd Amendment, however,
believes that the greater good is best served by creating as few potential
victims as possible. They argue that if more people are armed or has access to
guns, criminals would go elsewhere. After all they point out, criminals are, at
their core, cowards. They seek out the opportunities where they're most unlikely
to get caught or get hurt. By equaling the odds, gun related violence would
decline. They also believe, like the Founding Fathers, that government is not
to be trusted.
There a substantial distrust of
government on both sides of the political spectrum. In a 2022 Pew Report, only
22% of those polled said they trusted the government. When broken down by race,
Asians trusted the government most with 37% as did 29% of Hispanics. Just 24%
of Blacks had confidence in the government compared to only 16% of whites. Democrats
and Liberals in general expressed the greatest amount of trust with 26% while
only 7% Republicans and Conservatives did! Independents also polled at 29%.
Another indicator of the divide is a survey conducted by Quinnipiac University and published in the February 16, 2023 edition of The Hill. According to the poll, 62% of respondents said trusted the police in most or all cases to do the right thing, which may sound good until you look as the responses by race.
72% of whites surveyed said that had
confidence in law enforcement to do what was right at least most of the time.
49% of Hispanics agreed (Hispanics are the second largest demographic in the
U.S.). However, 66% of Blacks expressed little or no trust in the police to do what
was right! Asian responses were too small to tabulate.
That 66% represents 40.1 million people
or about 12.1% of our total population. That is a substantial amount,
especially when we member that they are affected more by gun related deaths
than any other group. They also make up 38.5% of the total prison population.
Whites and Hispanics comprise 57.5%. Native Americans are 2.6% and Asians are
1.4%. Nevertheless, Blacks incarceration rates are statistically higher given
the percentage of their total population.
We have to find a balance between
reducing gun related violence and protecting ourselves. We require gun
registration, age requirements, and waiting periods. Certain types of
ammunition and gun modification kits (such as "bump stocks") are
already banned. Schools used to offer gun safety classes which have long been discontinued.
Law enforcements provide gun safety locks free of charge for anyone who asks.
What else can we do? We can reintroduce
gun safety classes for first time purchasers of firearms or require periodic
gun safety recertification for all gun owners. This can readily be done through
the NRA and Gun Owners of America. In many states, certification classes are
required to obtain carry and conceal permits. However, some states have done
away with those, citing an infringement of their 2nd Amendment rights.
Currently, there is no registration requirements, background checks, or licenses required to purchase used firearms. Obviously creating a perfect venue for criminals. Perhaps extending the same requirements to buy new firearms should be applied to purchasing used firearms.
Efforts are underway to
allow individuals to sue gun manufacturers for a gun related death. That makes
as much sense as suing a car manufacturer in death of someone killed or injured
in a automobile accident or suing a knife maker for cutting your finger. It's a
complete abrogation of personal responsibility in my opinion.
Meanwhile, respect for law enforcement
and authority figures such as teachers needs to be reintroduce. It means removing
the graphic violence seen in video games which conditions young minds to
devalue life. It means moving away the focus on anti-social behavior by
reintroducing a sense of respect and responsibility of one's own actions and ending
the sense of entitlement.
Guns are essentially a tool. They can be
used for a multitude of purposes, most are good but some aren't. Either way
it's the intention of the user not the tool that is at fault regardless of
their race, religion, or ethnic background. We can reduce accidental shootings
by using common sense such as gun safety training and keeping them away from
children. But removing guns from law abiding citizens will have no affect on
those who intend on harming others. Criminals don't care a whit about laws or
restrictions. In fact, I dare say that criminals are the biggest supporters of
gun control.
If you want to know more about
this article's topic, please check out the links below. If you enjoyed the
article, please consider passing it along to others and don't forget to
subscribe. It's free! Lastly please be sure to "like" us on
whatever platform you use to read anotheropinionblog.com. It
helps with the algorithms and keeps our articles in circulation. Thank
you!
Alarming rise in youth gun deaths breaksdown differently by race
Gun Quotes From 20 of America's Founding
Fathers --- 2nd Amendment
Fact Check: Rates of white-on-white and black-on-black crimeare similar
Police Officer Demographics and Statistics In The U.S.
All Across Latin America, Unwed Mothers Are Now The Norm
African-American Family Structure
The Origins of the 'Acting White' Charge
Public Trust in Government 1958 - 2022
Bureau of Prisons: Inmate Race
62 percent in new survey trust police to do what is right all or most of the time
2 comments:
Nice article. Detailed, factual and quoting recognized expert sources on the subject.
Found a few of your points "interesting". While some might consider the Second Amendment outdated, I would point out that it is no more outdated than the First Amendment.
As far as the technology of firearms has advanced, so has the technology of communication. Just as there were no semi-automatic firearms at the time of the writing of the Constitution, neither were there electronic communications.
The biggest point I would make would be the portion of 2A that clearly states, "shall not be infringed."
In respect to your comments about few 2 parent households in the Black community, the entitlement programs perpetuated this, making it easier to receive "freebies" (food stamps, the valued Medicaid and other free benefits). Interestingly, many Black women have their children and only get married after the children are 18 or leave the home. I see this time and time again. I believe this is being preached from the pulpit, along with hatred toward Whites and authority. Black men seem to be praised for the proliferation of children (having multiple "baby mama's seem to be prized). I feel that the demeaning lyrics of the rap singers has a big influence on children and having the hate towards others talked about in the home, always feeling the "victim" influences the attitudes of young children. Working in the school system I see these sweet kids in elementary school turn into indifferent, angry teens with a huge attitude. It is such a waste. And it seems to be getting worse.
Post a Comment