Having the Stones to Take on Goliath

As readers of Another Opinion know, I've been engaged in a battle Kynect (Kentucky's "model" insurance exchange) and with Humana, to which I've been assigned. Just to briefly recap, my wife and I applied for insurance through the Kentucky insurance exchange known as "Kynect" (we have the distinction of being the second applicants to register when it went operational in August 2013). Somehow we managed to find every computer glitch and SNAFU in the system despite repeated assurances to the world by Governor Beshear that program was working without any hitches. By early October, our status had been elevated to the highest tier and I found myself dealing with programmers, systems analysts, and systems designers as they attempted to create "work arounds" in their programming and a host of other corrections.

Finally, by February 2014, things had settled down. Since we were enrolled in the system at the end of 2013, we were permitted to pick our start date for coverage to begin. We could chose from January, February or March. Since January had past and we had no medical bills worth any note, and as February was about over, we opted from March. However, "someone" at Kynect decided, when entering the information, that we really meant to say April instead of March, and changed our start date so we ended up absorbing medical bills for March (in all fairness, the senior manager at Kynect with whom we had been working gave us the option of correcting it back to March, however, the time required would have put us well into April anyway, so we opted just to "eat" the costs). Nevertheless, we ended up with some pretty good insurance, but no good deed goes unpunished, especially when dealing with the government.

At the end of 2014, we started getting notices from Kynect saying our coverage was changing (and apparently without our consent). I called our insurance provider several times over the next 45 or so days and was "assured" that our coverage was not changing and we should ignore the notices received from Kynect; we would keep our existing coverage we were repeatedly told. Finally, in early February 2015, I phoned Kynect to see what was going on. Well, it seems that their income calculation formula had changed and we were being removed from our insurance provider and transferred to Humana. Despite my protestations, we were moved in mid-February. At the same time, we received notices from our (now) former provider that our premiums were about to expire (Kynect paid a portion and we paid the balance). Although I repeatedly explained what had happened and offered to fax or email our notices from Kynect, I was advised that my offer (and my explanation) were appreciated but not acceptable. They needed "official" notice direct for Kynect. "Okey dokey" I said, and promptly contacted Kynect to (again) express my frustration and relay their request. I was told that an official notice will be sent, however, an "advisement" had already been issued.

Meanwhile, I discovered that despite Kynect's repeated promises (parroting Obama's) that I could keep my doctors, that in the event I

couldn't, my new carrier would pay for any prescriptions and tests. I, however, would be responsible for paying the office visit. Needless to say, I was dismayed when my primary doctor of 32 years (and who is the area's only known sub-specialist) wouldn't see me when I showed up for my scheduled appointment. I was told that I couldn't even pay cash money for the visit, and to jab the knife a little deeper, my doctor could not write me any more prescriptions while I searched for his replacement. Once my refills ran out, I was, to use the proper medical terminology, screwed. As soon as I got home, I immediately phoned Kynect. Again, they offered their heartfelt and most sincere apologies, but there was nothing that could do about changing the insurer. It was suggested to connect my new provider, Humana, to see if they could locate a doctor for me. "Fat chance" I thought as I said "thank you" as politely as I could muster and hung up the phone.

So I contacted Humana's Customer Service Department. After going through a battery of options to select from (which included what language I wanted---I will never ever press a button for English as long as I live in this country), and a ten minute wait, I finally spoke with a living breathing person. After explaining my situation (while listening to timely interjections of "we're sorry for your inconvenience), I was given a list of six doctors for me to call. I quickly learned that none of these were specialist of the type I needed, but it didn't matter. None were accepting Humana. So, for the next two months, I made my daily calls with the latest of doctors Human had given me, but I jump ahead of myself.

Somewhere along the third week, I managed to get lucky. One of the customer representatives I spoke with (and whose first language was apparently English), blurted out near the end of one of my frustrated phone calls that I could submit a "Continuing Patient Care Request" and then almost as an afterthought, asked if I would like to do so. "Hell yeah" I said. So together---her writing out the synopsis while I provided my medical history, prescriptions, and reason for my request. When we ended, she said it would take approximately 7 to 10 days to get a decision (really? That was like a sleepover by this time). So while I waited, I continued to make my calls and get my daily rejections only to call Humana and get my next list of six doctors with the names sounding less and less familiar by the day from the ever changing representatives (after, of course, having to repeat my story). Some of the rejections were due to the physician winding down their practice; moved out of state; or were simply located in the wrong part of the state; wrong specialty; or simply was not accepting Humana any longer.

Finally, the tenth day came and I was on the phone for what I hoped would be my approval. However, as if to throw salt on the previously mentioned proverbial knife wound, I was told that no decision had been reached yet, so in addition to calling for my list of six, I now had to ask for status updates (as an aside, I was also providing them with updates on the doctors whose names they had given me. Evidently their list hadn't been updated in quiet awhile). Then it came.

I had been reading when the phone rang. I started to ignore the call, figuring it was another solicitor calling, despite my being on the "No Call" list, when I noticed it was my (now) former primary doctor's office calling. So I answered, expecting to hear some other piece of bad news. I don't know if I can correctly express my emotion or thoughts as I was informed that they had just concluded a series of conference calls with my current provider and given my medical needs and length of time I've been with their office, my request was approved. She was calling as quickly as possible to let me know and schedule an appointment as soon as I wanted. I remember being instantly relieved; excited; angry at having been put through the hoops; the corporate and government bureaucracy, that I must of had her repeat herself two or three times (I don't she minded. She knew me from all these years and how much I had fought this).

So, we scheduled an appointment and she explain that my efforts also resulted in a change in policy, both for their offices as well

as for Humana's that would allow longstanding patients to remain with their primary care physician provided the physician was willing to keep the patient on. I didn't feel the need to gloat but I was quietly pleased to know that my efforts may also be helpful to others in a similar position as mine. Most people would have given up I realize, but I not one of those people. I don't believe in giving up the fight if the cause is just, be it for me or for someone else. I've been a community and political activist for well over 35 years. I've also helped countless numbers of individuals take on their own "Goliath" over the decades (while "Goliath" is a good, if not common, analogy, I'm reminded more of Odysseus and the Cyclops, Polyhemus, and in particular Odysseus's response as he sailed away; having outwitted this son of Poseidon). I did it from elementary school on; while in the military; in college; and in every job I ever had. It's simply my nature I guess.

As an comical aside, remember those notices I had been receiving from my the original insurance provider mentioned above? Well, I continue to receive them, advising me that my premium remain due while I continue to advise them that I was removed by Kynect at the end of January. Meanwhile, I've checked with Kynect and have been assured that they have been repeatedly notified of my removal from their policy (I was even provided a reference number which I had sent on). Despite their disinterest in my notices from Kynect, I faxed of copies to them all the same. Just a few days ago, I received a new set of membership cards. You just have to love corporate bureaucracy.


Greek Myths & Greek Mythology
http://www.greekmyths-greekmythology.com/odysseus-and-cyclops-myth/

The Great Obamacare Circle Jerk: The Final Round

I'm one who really hates leaving loose ends. Call it a quirk of mine. I just like finishing whatever I start, particularly if there is the potential to learn something new. So on that note, let me take you back to a previous article of mine,"The Great Obamacare Circle Jerk", which I posted on April 12. As you recall, I had been stripped of my primary healthcare provider of nearly 33 years by my state's healthcare exchange and forced in to a new healthcare program which I didn't want. My wife and I were completely happy with what we had.

I filed a "Continuity of Care" request, which was submitted to the insurance company's medical review board. I pointed out that my primary doctor and I had a strong and unique relation which stretched back close to 33 years. I stressed that he became the kind of subspecialist I needed as a result of my rather unique set of medical circumstances, and that he was perhaps the only doctor in the area with this subspecialty. He treated me as an equal partner in my care; none of this "godlike" attitude which some doctors are notorious for having. He always listen to my suggestions and read any material I came across, which we'd discuss during my next office visit (I've always taken a proactive stance to my medical care). I also pointed out that if they didn't want to cover this doctor, that I would be willing to pay for the office visit out of pocket.

Although the insurance company assured me it would be only five to ten days before received a response, it was a full two weeks after their ten day limit came and went. Meanwhile, I called every day after the tenth day passed, always getting someone new, to ask if they had made a decision; explaining each time the same events over and over to whomever was unlucky enough to get my phone call. I repeatedly stressed the importance of keeping this doctor, and pointed out that I was in need of an immediate decision since I was getting low on my prescriptions.

It was always on my own initiative in calling them. Never did they ever call me. Anyway, some two weeks after their promised response deadline lapsed, I was finally advised of their decision. According to the hapless customer service representative, my request had been denied. I was told that their decision had actually been made almost a week prior but had just recently been entered into the system. How interesting I thought since each time I'd call I was told that either an email or phone message was being left with their medical review team in change of making the decision. You would think somebody would have the professionalism or common courtesy from this committee (if indeed there really is one) to either contact their own representative for a call back to me or better yet, to call me personally since I asked that my request be treated as urgent, but no.

When I asked why, I'm given a story, which in hindsight, seems a bit farfetched. Accordingly, I was told that the medical review committee designated someone to contact the doctor's office to see if they would agree to accept their insurance. As you may recall from my previous article, my doctor had carried this particular insurance for years, but effective the first of January 2015, would no longer be accepted. I was also advised that I could not pay by credit card or even by cash! Can you imagine being turned down for cash? Well, I was, and now the insurance company is telling me that I'm not allowed to pay cash or credit card for anything medical as it would constitute a "fraud". Admittedly, my first thought was disbelief. I've never been turned down for good ole American greenbacks ever. Then I was hit with the thought, could this be what people mean by the so-called Obamacare "death panels"? You are forced to accept treatment from who they approve or do without. By the same token, they can turn you down for a particular treatment and there is nothing you could do about it or any place you can go since you are "in the system" and there's no recourse beyond the appeal. As for a new doctor, I was given a choice of three---none of which have the expertise that I require. I asked if it wouldn't be cheaper to allow me to see my existing doctor than for me to see a new doctor who was not only unfamiliar with me but unfamiliar with the type of treatment I required? The end result I pointed out could be misdiagnosis, wasted office visits and fees, not to mention useless prescriptions and possible ongoing trips to an immediate care center or even emergency room...all of which they would have to pay for.

Naturally they "sympathized" with my situation, but stated that their decision was final and there was not further appeals. Since I had previously brought the matter of prescriptions, I was told that certain medicines (including one in particular that I'm taking) could be rejected no matter what it was for or how well I responded to it. To be more specific, I was told that my doctor (whomever that turns out to be) would have to call to get permission to prescribe it each time as long as there was no generic version. Otherwise, they reserved the right to decline coverage of the prescription and/or authorizing a substitute of their own choice (thus overriding the physician). Then they had the audacity to end the call by thanking me for calling and asking if I was satisfied with their responses! I admit dear reader, I've never done well with authority figures, and I tolerate even less bureaucratic simpletons setting in a cube somewhere, who has no clue who the hell I am or cares what my unique medical needs are, making decisions about me---especially my healthcare---based on their bottom line or some profit making arrangement they've made with a drug manufacturer. That just doesn't cut it with me, but there it is.

Right now, we have several local Republicans running for governor; each of whom has promised to either reform, cut back or vanquish our Obamacare based insurance system (for that matter, so are various potential and announced GOP Presidential candidates). Listen, I am absolutely the poster boy for what's wrong with my state's insurance system. It's not the hassle free system that they try to make it out to be, but at the same time, without it, we and others like us would have no coverage at all. The problem here is that it was rolled out without being fully thought through. Two years in, and there are still plenty of bugs, glitches, and administrative "Catch 22" issues, which is where I find myself.

What is needed is something more sensible like a single payer platform wherein everyone receives a basic level of coverage and then have the option of buying an additional "add on" coverage cafeteria style that fits their unique healthcare needs. This could be done either on the open market or through their employer. That way everyone gets to see at least some measure of medical care and small companies, which couldn't afford to offer insurance to their employees, could still remain competitive and those currently offering (or struggling to offer) insurance could cut back on their benefit packages without unduly affecting their employees. Another obstacle which should be removed immediately is a simple one: allow individuals to keep their existing doctors regardless of what package they have. After all, wasn't that President Obama's primary argument in selling Obamacare to the American People---that no one would lose their doctor? Or that we wouldn't lose our prescription coverage? Well, under Obamacare and at least Kentucky's version, that is proving to be a blatant boldfaced lie. Not everyone gets to keep their doctor, even if they're a specialist and no one else is available. And no, not everyone gets to keep their medication unless there's a generic substitute, otherwise, they simply don't get the medication or they're forced into taking something which may or may not work or work as well; even to the point of potentially having a negative reaction to it.

So friends, there you have it. A firsthand account of someone who has dealt with Obamacare and Kentucky's insurance exchange. For

some, perhaps even the majority of individuals, it may work. However, it remains flawed and it has been my experience thus far, that if you happen to fall into the category where you are in some way an exception to their rule, such a requiring a specific doctor, continuing with a specific doctor, or requiring a certain medication, and I would add to that requiring certain medical procedures, you're in deep trouble. The system doesn't allow for exceptions nor do the faceless bureaucrats running system seem to particularly care about your medical needs. Their sole concern seems to be about improving their bottom line, and in that quest, just maybe, is the truth about the so-called "death panels" we've all heard about. Naturally, I'm sure it's nothing personal.